The Myriad
Is it possible that humanity has reached the tipping point in the quest for an ideal government? A point where there is no longer, the ability to agree with one another in a public or social setting. More importantly, the inability to come to a common understanding of a 'myriad' of variables ? Myriad by definition is...
1. a very great or indefinitely great number of persons or things.
2. ten thousand.
–adjective
3. of an indefinitely great number; innumerable: the myriad stars of a summer night.
When you think of the US, with it's "two views" on society, democratic, and republic. Can you not help but think of summing up millions of views into one of two classes ? Certainly it is impossible. I love Ron Paul and Ross Perot as leaders of the US. As a mostly republican, independent, I understand the importance of introducing a third party view. The libertarian party. Though I dislike having my opinions on the myriad of variables dwindled down and stereotyped into even one of three traditional views. There are far too many issues to be dealt with, and far to many arguments for each to place me neatly into any one of the three.
Is it possible that due to the complexity of social issues that the unintended consequences of the myriad of variables makes it impossible to come to an agreement with any traditional/stereotyped Group of thinking ? Is it possible that the two dominating parties like it this way? Where anyone you walk up to in America has to be summed up in one of X amount of views on an incredible complex issue ? It certainly does assure that half of Americans won't agree with the other half. It does that very well. But what if there are varying levels of disagreement about governments involvement with the many possibilities of a myriad of variables? Then things get exponential.
It might just be that the two party system has been a failure from the start and that much more work needs to be done to encapsulate the myriad views on the infinite variables on law, government, life, and their involvement within one another. There are far too many opinions in today's day and age to ignore that fall into neither category. This middle ground needs to be examined, and clarified to show that there are many considerations when issuing new laws, or revising established ones. I truly hope we innovate a new and more effective and efficient means of governing masses of humans.
1. a very great or indefinitely great number of persons or things.
2. ten thousand.
–adjective
3. of an indefinitely great number; innumerable: the myriad stars of a summer night.
When you think of the US, with it's "two views" on society, democratic, and republic. Can you not help but think of summing up millions of views into one of two classes ? Certainly it is impossible. I love Ron Paul and Ross Perot as leaders of the US. As a mostly republican, independent, I understand the importance of introducing a third party view. The libertarian party. Though I dislike having my opinions on the myriad of variables dwindled down and stereotyped into even one of three traditional views. There are far too many issues to be dealt with, and far to many arguments for each to place me neatly into any one of the three.
Is it possible that due to the complexity of social issues that the unintended consequences of the myriad of variables makes it impossible to come to an agreement with any traditional/stereotyped Group of thinking ? Is it possible that the two dominating parties like it this way? Where anyone you walk up to in America has to be summed up in one of X amount of views on an incredible complex issue ? It certainly does assure that half of Americans won't agree with the other half. It does that very well. But what if there are varying levels of disagreement about governments involvement with the many possibilities of a myriad of variables? Then things get exponential.
It might just be that the two party system has been a failure from the start and that much more work needs to be done to encapsulate the myriad views on the infinite variables on law, government, life, and their involvement within one another. There are far too many opinions in today's day and age to ignore that fall into neither category. This middle ground needs to be examined, and clarified to show that there are many considerations when issuing new laws, or revising established ones. I truly hope we innovate a new and more effective and efficient means of governing masses of humans.
Labels: democrat, govenment, libertarian, people, republican
posted by John at
9:21 PM
1 Comments
